AI Journal Analyzer

Annual Spotify Wrapped, But For Journaling (Fall 2024 - Ongoing)

1/31/20253 min read

The Challenge

Problem Discovery: As an avid journaler for 6+ years, I analyzed my habits and spoke with other journalers on reddit.com/r/Journaling (2.1M subs). I identified 3 core user needs for avid journalers:

  1. Discovering emotional patterns over time

  2. Identifying recurring topics and their impacts over time

  3. Gaining objective insights that might not be apparent through manual review

Feature Prioritization: I prioritized features based on three criteria:

  1. Impact on core user insights

  2. My technical abilities and feasibility within cost constraints

  3. Development time

Results: Successfully built an MVP for an AI-powered journal analysis tool that identified emotional patterns and key insights from years of personal journal data.

Project Summary

Core Tools Used:

AI/ML: V0, Replit, Cursor, Gemini, OpenAI API (GPT-4o-mini, Embeddings), RAG, NumPy, Pandas, Matplotlib
Languages: Python, NextJS, HTML, JSON, React,
Databases: PostgreSQL with pgvector, SQLAlchemy, Psycopg2, LangChain

Core Skills Learned:

API Integration, AI Implementation, Prompt Engineering, Product Strategy, Databases, Coding Using AI, Developing an MVP

Timeline:

V1 (MVP): Fall 2024
V2: Winter 2024 - Ongoing

Architecture:

Raw Journal Entry → Preprocessing → Embedding Generation → Sentiment Analysis → Pattern Detection → Multi-modal Output

Processed 2.1K journal entries (375K words) spanning 6 years

Approach

Development Process

V1: MVP and Proof of Concept

The initial version focused on validating the core concept with minimal complexity:

  1. Data Ingestion: Built a converter to transform personal journal entries into structured JSON format

  2. Embedding Generation: Created embeddings for each journal entry to enable semantic analysis

  3. Pattern Detection: Implemented two approaches for comparison:

    • Clustering-based approach using HDBSCAN (computationally efficient but less accurate)

    • LLM-based analysis using GPT-4o-mini (more accurate but higher cost)

  4. Visualization: Generated static HTML reports with emotional timelines and pattern descriptions

V2 (Ongoing): Scalable Web Application

Based on learnings from V1, I designed a more robust solution:

  1. Web Application: NextJS frontend with interactive D3.js visualizations

  2. Backend Processing: Python with FastAPI deployed on Replit, connected to Cursor via SSH for easier AI coding

  3. Enhanced Analysis: Two-phase processing approach:

    • Initial comprehensive analysis (one-time processing)

    • Search infrastructure for AI-powered features

  4. Data Storage: PostgreSQL with pgvector for efficient embedding storage and retrieval

  5. Advanced Features: Topic discovery, writing style analysis, image analysis, other data sources (i.e. spotify wrapped data, health data, etc) and personal growth tracking

Key Technical Challenges & Solutions

Challenge 1: Context Length Limitations

With 375K words (~500K tokens), processing the entire journal history exceeded API context limits.

Solution: Implemented month-by-month processing with aggregation of results, allowing for scalable analysis without sacrificing contextual understanding.

Challenge 2: API Cost Management

Full processing of all journal entries would incur significant API costs.

Solution: Leveraged embeddings and RAG to reduce token usage, processed data in batches, and implemented caching to prevent redundant API calls.

Identifying emotional patterns across time required sophisticated analysis beyond simple sentiment scoring.

Solution: Combined embedding-based similarity measures with GPT-4o-mini's natural language understanding to detect nuanced patterns in emotional expression.

Challenge 3: Complex Pattern Detection

Product Insights

  1. User-Centered Design: Starting with a personal need led to more intuitive feature prioritization

  2. Technical Trade-offs: Making deliberate choices between ideal and practical implementations (JSON vs. Database, static vs. hosted)

  3. Incremental Development: The two-version approach allowed for validating core concepts before adding complexity

Technical Learnings

  1. AI Integration: Gained practical experience integrating OpenAI's API, managing tokens, and optimizing costs. Learned how to code using AI tools like Claude, Cursor, Replit, and V0.

  2. RAG Implementation: Developed understanding of retrieval augmented generation for enhancing LLM outputs

  3. Embeddings Usage: Learned to effectively utilize embeddings for semantic analysis and pattern detection

Next Steps (V2 - Ongoing)

  1. Multi-Format Support: Add support for handwritten journals through image-to-text transcription

  2. Enhanced Visualization: Implement more interactive visualization options similar to Spotify Wrapped

  3. Comparative Analytics: Develop year-over-year comparison features to track personal growth

  4. Community Version: Create a privacy-preserving version that can be used by the journaling community


    Image shown is a mockup using V0.dev. V2 of the AI journal analyzer is still in development.